This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred
The heads of the United Nations and the Red Cross called for greater controls on autonomous weapons systems — so-called killer robots — this week, warning that the technology’s advancement is outpacing regulation at a deadly rate.
“We are now dangerously close to crossing a moral red line: the autonomous targeting of humans by machines,” U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres and International Committee of the Red Cross president Mirjana Spoljaric Egger said in a joint statement released Tuesday.
But experts on the use of artificial intelligence in combat say that line already has been crossed. A Russian drone that killed three civilians in southeastern Ukraine in July appeared to have been guided to its final target solely by artificial intelligence, according to news reports.
Though the drone was programmed to travel to a particular gas station by human operators, its final target mostly likely was selected by the weapon’s own internal system.
“The weapons had no antenna for human piloting and had a powerful onboard computer with pretrained target categories,” said Stuart Russell, a UC Berkeley professor of computer sciences and president of the International Assn. for Safe & Ethical AI.
The size of New York’s tech talent workforce surpassed the San Francisco Bay Area for the first time as tech companies lay off workers, a new report from CBRE shows.
While the three sheltering civilians killed when the drone crashed into a wall appear to be the first non-combatant deaths by autonomous weapons, they may not be the first human casualties.
Ukraine conducted a one-off experimental test of fully autonomous drones two years ago that killed Russian soldiers, according to an official quoted in New Scientist magazine.
“If we need to put a date on it, [that experiment] strikes me as the Rubicon moment,” said Ryan Jenkins, a Cal Poly associate professor of philosophy and senior fellow at the Ethics + Emerging Sciences Group who studies the ethics of automated war. “I believe, unfortunately, that the line has been crossed.”
Military technology has been moving steadily toward greater automation for decades, Jenkins said. The crucial distinction of the most recent class of AI weaponry is that it removes humans from the “kill chain” entirely, instead of just relying on automation for individual functions like detecting or tracking targets.
The U.N. and Red Cross called for a ban on autonomous weapons that target humans, as opposed to incoming missiles or infrastructure targets, or that are “unpredictable,” meaning that a human operator can’t predict the outcome once the weapon is deployed.
Independent scientists said it appears a SpaceX rocket, about the size of a school bus, has crashed into the moon.
It’s the second such appeal the organizations have made in three years. Yet meaningful, comprehensive control of AI both on the battlefield and off has languished, largely because trust between governments and understanding of the technology and its risks is lacking, Russell said.
