This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.<\/p>\n
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred<\/p>\n
California filed two lawsuits against the Trump administration Monday \u2014 one to block President Trump\u2019s latest round of tariffs on international trading partners, the other to block his administration from sharing needy families\u2019 personal data with immigration officials.<\/p>\n
California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, whose office brought the lawsuits alongside other Democrat-led states, said they were both intended to rein in a lawless president pushing policies that threaten American families already struggling to afford basic necessities.<\/p>\n
Bonta said the new tariffs are part of a \u201cfailed and illegal economic policy\u201d that has previously been blocked in court. He alleged that the proposed data sharing was part of a broader and illegal \u201cmass surveillance effort\u201d by the Trump administration to target its political opponents.<\/p>\n
The White House has previously defended both tariffs and data-sharing policies as part of Trump\u2019s \u201cAmerica first\u201d agenda to improve the economic standing of American families.<\/p>\n
In separate statements to The Times, it defended the new tariffs as a legitimate means of combating forced labor in international markets, which it alleged is having a negative impact on the U.S., and dismissed the data-sharing challenge as an effort by Democrats to protect undocumented immigrants over American families.<\/p>\n
Trump has previously defended his tariffs, including a prior set that was ruled illegal by the U.S. Supreme Court, as necessary to fix years of unfair trading practices in which international partners took advantage of the U.S. However, many economists have determined that the cost of the tariffs are being passed on to U.S. consumers and contributing to the persistent inflation causing economic pain nationwide.<\/p>\n
Trump, the White House and top officials in his administration have also previously defended the sharing of personal data among U.S. agencies, and from individual states to the federal government, as a commonsense way to reduce waste and fraud and to identify and remove people who are in the country illegally and consuming benefits intended for American families.<\/p>\n
The administration has previously sought the personal data of Medicaid recipients, SNAP food assistance recipients, immigrants who have filed taxes with the Internal Revenue Service and registered voters in states across the country. All of those demands have also been challenged in court, with varying degrees of success.<\/p>\n
Bonta\u2019s office has now filed 82 lawsuits against the current Trump administration.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s latest tariffs, levies of between 10% and 12.5%, took effect late last month and apply to more than 80 countries, including some of the closest U.S. allies and largest trading partners such as Canada, Mexico and the European Union. They followed a Trump administration announcement of new 50% tariffs on many Canadian products, set to go into effect this month.<\/p>\n
\u201cTariffs are taxes, and the American people cannot and should not shoulder the extra costs that come from the president\u2019s failed and illegal economic policy \u2014 no matter how much the president wants them to,\u201d Bonta said in announcing the lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade.<\/p>\n
Two previous attempts by the Trump administration to unilaterally levy tariffs on trading partners were rejected by the courts in the face of similar legal challenges by California and other states. In February, the Supreme Court rejected a sweeping slate of tariffs Trump had imposed on an emergency basis. In May, the Court of International Trade turned back another set.<\/p>\n
The Trump administration has said the president\u2019s latest tariffs are authorized by a separate law not considered in the previous litigation \u2014 one related to combating forced labor in global trade.<\/p>\n