An Ichthyosaur\u2019s terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day 160 million years ago<\/p>\n
A rare fossil find shows a tooth embedded an ichthyosaur\u2019s vertebra, where it was likely left when a giant pliosaurid chomped down on this dolphin-resembling reptile<\/p>\n
A computer rendering of a shonisaurus ichthyosaur.<\/p>\n
Off the coast of what is now Peterborough, England, an ichthyosaur\u2014a prehistoric marine reptile that resembled an oversize dolphin\u2014was presumably going about its business, looking for fish and ammonites to eat, when it had a very unlucky day indeed. Another ancient marine reptile known as a pliosaurid\u2014which was three times the ichthyosaur\u2019s size and had a head as big as an adult human body\u2014took a giant bite out of the smaller creature\u2019s spine that likely led to its demise.<\/p>\n
It has long been thought that pliosaurids and their cousins, the long-necked plesiosaurs, were apex predators that fed on smaller (but still enormous) creatures such as ichthyosaurs, marine crocodiles and giant bonefish. But an ichthyosaur vertebra punctured by a broken-off pliosaurid tooth that was found moldering in a museum drawer has provided rare physical proof.<\/p>\n
It forever fossilizes a very violent moment in the prehistoric circle of life, showing how these ancient sea monsters lived. \u201cThis simple, unassuming lump of rock that we found in an abandoned museum drawer provides a snapshot of a moment in time where one ancient sea monster is attacking another,\u201d says Caleb Gordon, a postdoctoral researcher at the Florida Museum of Natural History in Gainesville and lead author of a recent Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History study describing the find.<\/p>\n
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.<\/p>\n
Since the tooth of the pliosaurid was embedded in bone, researchers used computed tomography (CT) scans and a technique that stacks high-magnification images on top of one another to analyze the serrated edges and shape of the tooth to confirm that it came from a pliosaurid. The researchers say that the way the fossil was preserved means that the tooth was more likely to have been ripped off in a moment of predation because there aren\u2019t visible signs of acidification on the vertebra to hint that it went through a predator\u2019s stomach and was scavenged by another predator afterward.<\/p>\n
The team also pored through unpublished handwritten correspondence between two prolific Victorian fossil collectors, Nicholson Leeds and Othniel Charles Marsh, as well as a centuries-old Yale Peabody Museum ledger to uncover the English provenance of the specimen, which is thought to date to the Upper Jurassic epoch, spanning between 163 million and 145 million years ago.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt shows us how much important data there still is to mine in old museum collections,\u201d says W. Scott Persons, a paleontologist and curator of natural history at the South Carolina State Museum, who was not involved in the study.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s always tricky to infer behavior from what\u2019s left behind in the fossil record, says F. Robin O\u2019Keefe, a professor of vertebrate anatomy at Marshall University in West Virginia, who was also not involved in the study, and this leaves room to indulge in some speculation. But he does think that the tooth, which he says was driven hard into the vertebra, was most likely a fatal bite that did indeed come from a giant pliosaurid.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt had a huge mouth and huge, [Tyrannosaurus rex\u2013like], banana-sized teeth crushing down on the thorax,\u201d O\u2019Keefe says. \u201cI bet the head [of the ichthyosaur] fell off on one side and the tail fell off on the other.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sara Novak is a science writer based on Sullivan\u2019s Island, S.C. Her work has appeared in Discover, Sierra Magazine, Popular Science, New Scientist, among other publications. Follow Novak on X @sarafnovak<\/p>\n
If you enjoyed this article, I\u2019d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.<\/p>\n
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.<\/p>\n