New findings further call into question scientific judgment of current health leaders in the Trump administration<\/p>\n
A French researcher whose work was praised by Donald Trump and Dr Mehmet Oz during the Covid-19 pandemic published hundreds of papers with \u201csubstantial\u201d ethical and legal concerns, according to a new analysis.<\/p>\n
An international team of scientists found concerns in 853 articles published by the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire M\u00e9diterran\u00e9e Infection, or the IHU, hundreds more than previously flagged by past investigations into work at the large research hospital. Of those, institute founder Didier Raoult was listed as co-author on 758 of them, according to one of the researchers behind the new analysis.<\/p>\n
Raoult rocketed to the global stage in March 2020, when the novel virus was spreading unchecked and killing people across the world. He and several colleagues published research that claimed hydroxychloroquine \u2013 a drug used for malaria and certain autoimmune conditions \u2013 was found to be an effective treatment for Covid-19, especially in combination with the drug azithromycin.<\/p>\n
Trump at the time called Raoult\u2019s research on hydroxychloroquine a \u201cgamechanger\u201d, though many scientists disagreed and raised concerns about the quality of the research, including Dr Anthony Fauci, then a top Trump adviser.<\/p>\n
Despite those calls for caution, Oz, who now heads the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, an agency responsible for $1.6tn in spending, echoed Trump at the time in calling Raoult\u2019s work a gamechanger. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, made a high-profile visit to the institute and met with Raoult. Later, Robert F Kennedy Jr called Raoult\u2019s work \u201cpowerful\u201d and dedicated a book he wrote that blasted Fauci in part to Raoult.<\/p>\n
The drug has not been shown to be effective as a Covid-19 treatment, and the paper was ultimately retracted for ethical and scientific reasons in 2025. But it had become one of the most famous articles of the pandemic era, having been cited thousands of times.<\/p>\n
The new findings further call into question the scientific judgment of current health leaders in the Trump administration, who have said they are committed to restoring what they call \u201cgold-standard science\u201d informing federal policy. A Republican-led committee of the US Senate recently voted to hold Fauci in contempt for pleading the fifth during a hearing about Covid-19\u2019s origins.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Oz had reviewed\/read the study correctly he would have found many of the problems\u201d that were raised about it, said Lonni Besan\u00e7on, an assistant professor in data visualization at Link\u00f6ping University in Sweden and a member of the international research team that did the new analysis, which was published this month in the journal Research Integrity and Peer Review.<\/p>\n
Besan\u00e7on said the now-retracted article was used to claim there was a cure for Covid, led to shortages of hydroxychloroquine and drove scientists to pour their attention into researching that drug rather than other promising leads. It also fueled conspiracy theories from people who argued the article was being attacked \u201cbecause if there was a cure for Covid then they couldn\u2019t sell their vaccines\u201d, he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cA lot of time was wasted,\u201d Besan\u00e7on said. \u201cIt\u2019s been a massively influential paper, and it\u2019s also been used to push for an antivax agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fauci, who was a leading member of the White House coronavirus taskforce, was asked at a news conference with Trump on 20 March 2020 whether there was evidence hydroxychloroquine could be used to combat Covid-19. Fauci, standing with the president, replied, \u201cThe answer is no,\u201d called such research \u201canecdotal evidence\u201d and noted it was not done in a controlled clinical trial. He called for rigorous scientific research to show whether it would be both safe and effective.<\/p>\n
But the next day, Trump cited Raoult\u2019s research in a tweet, saying hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin \u201chave a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine\u201d and saying he hoped they would be put in use immediately.<\/p>\n
Two days later, Oz, then a TV personality and physician, appeared on Fox & Friends, where he said he was \u201cflabbergasted\u201d by Raoult\u2019s research and urged the US government to procure the drug.<\/p>\n
\u201cI read the study. I was stunned. Literally, a jaw dropped. I didn\u2019t know it was possible,\u201d Oz said.<\/p>\n