Network alleges FCC is trying to send \u2018chilling message\u2019 in retaliation for content the administration disapproves of<\/p>\n
ABC has sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), arguing that it is being retaliated against for content-based reasons in a move it warns threatens the independence of the press.<\/p>\n
The network filed the lawsuit on Tuesday after being forced to apply early to renew its license to broadcast on the eight local television stations it owns. It is waiting to hear whether the Brendan Carr-led FCC approves its renewal requests, or, more likely, holds a hearing on their merits.<\/p>\n
Late last month, a group of prominent former FCC officials, including key staffers and commissioners appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents, issued a warning \u2013 in a filing \u2013 that the agency is trying to send a \u201cchilling message\u201d to broadcasters after forcing ABC to apply early.<\/p>\n
Conservative organizations, including the Center for American Rights and the Media Research Center, filed petitions urging the FCC to deny the renewals, arguing that the network\u2019s journalism is politically bias. ABC also still faces an FCC investigation over the daytime talkshow The View for a potential violation of equal time rules, an inquiry that remains open.<\/p>\n
\u201cActing through the Federal Communications Commission, the Administration has waged a retaliatory campaign against ABC for a single reason: it disapproves of what ABC broadcasts,\u201d the network said in the suit, filed on behalf of its eight local stations in district court for the District of Columbia.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat campaign began in this Administration\u2019s earliest days and has only intensified since. Again and again, the Administration has attacked ABC\u2019s speech \u2013 the stories its journalists report and the viewpoints its network programs air. Over time, those attacks have escalated into express demands that ABC be stripped of its broadcast licenses because of its speech.\u201d<\/p>\n
The lawsuit makes clear that ABC does not expect the FCC to renew its licenses, posing an existential threat to the network.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Commission is poised to make good on its threat any day now: the public comment period on the renewal applications has closed, and the Commission may, at any moment, issue an unprecedented Hearing Designation Order for all eight Stations, which would kick off a formal agency adjudication to determine the fate of ABC\u2019s licenses.\u201d<\/p>\n
The network said that any adjudication process over its licenses would be a \u201ccharade\u201d, particularly because the agency cannot, by statute, grant license renewals several years early.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Commission cannot lawfully grant renewal this early in the license terms \u2013 the only outcomes on the table are adverse to Plaintiffs,\u201d the network said in the lawsuit, expressing concern that the FCC would either \u201cprolong\u201d the process, \u201cmiring ABC in years of costly litigation\u201d, or deny it altogether.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn either scenario, the Administration accomplishes its goal of eliminating a perceived media critic: either it gets Plaintiffs to fall in line, or it silences them if they refuse,\u201d the plaintiffs argued.<\/p>\n
ABC\u2019s lawyers argued that, if left unchecked, the Trump administration would have the ability to retaliate against any media company they dislike for editorial and political purposes. \u201cIf the Administration gets its way, the message to every media company in the country will be unmistakable: tell only the stories the Administration deems favorable, or face the coercive machinery of the federal government,\u201d they wrote. \u201cIn such a world, the press could in no way be described as free.\u201d<\/p>\n
The network asked the court to stop the FCC from taking any actions against it or threatening any actions against it.<\/p>\n
The Guardian has approached ABC for comment on the lawsuit.<\/p>\n