Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials,
\n Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription<\/p>\n
The View From India
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tLooking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.<\/p>\n
First Day First Show
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tNews and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.<\/p>\n
Today's Cache
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tYour download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.<\/p>\n
Science For All
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!<\/p>\n
Data Point
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDecoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers<\/p>\n
THEdge
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAt the cutting edge of education and careers<\/p>\n
Health Matters
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRamya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there<\/p>\n
Gender Agenda
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStories from beyond the binary.<\/p>\n
The Hindu On Books
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBooks of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.<\/p>\n
A performance audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of the Green India Mission (GIM) has found that a scheme conceived to heal India\u2019s forests had, across a decade, achieved almost nothing it set out to do. Instead of improving forest quality over 1.4 million hectares, the mission only managed 0.11 million \u2014 not even a tenth of the target. On expanding forest cover, the mission barely scraped together four per cent. The Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) channels money collected from industry for diverting forest land into afforestation, while the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, now rebranded as VB-G RAM G funds rural wage labour that can be used for plantation and land-restoration works, but GIM\u2019s intended convergence with these schemes never materialised. The mission was one of the eight pillars of the National Action Plan on Climate Change, unveiled in 2008, and the instrument through which India promised the Paris Agreement an additional carbon sink of 2.5 billion to 3 billion tonnes by 2030. Its animating idea was ecological \u2014 biodiversity, water, sequestration, and the revival of habitat. GIM however seems to be on the back burner and, for all practical purposes, replaced by a tree plantation drive called \u2018Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam (A Tree in the Name of Mother)\u2019. Launched in 2024, the government reports planting 140 crore saplings so far, but the latest forest data expose the gulf between a tree and a forest. The India State of Forest Report 2023 records a gain of 1,445 square kilometres in green cover but only 156 sq km of it is true forest. The rest, 1,289 sq km, is \u2018tree cover outside recorded forests.\u2019 Within the recorded forests, dense canopy is thinning into scrub. Ergo, India is planting more and foresting less.<\/p>\n
Few examples encapsulate this as much as the controversy over the Aravallis. Arguably the country\u2019s most degraded range \u2014 its hillocks quarried away, its native growth overrun by the invasive \u2018vilayati kikar\u2019 (Prosopis juliflora) \u2014 it is now to be rescued by a \u2018Green Wall\u2019 of fresh planting. But these arboreal conscripts cannot undo the damage from years of mining, halt encroachment, or summon back an ecosystem that took millennia to form. Restoration is not landscaping. The CAG\u2019s instrument is accountancy: it can count hectares and rupees, not the worth of a living forest; and its assessment cannot always capture the practical challenges of implementing missions. However, its verdict still lands. A mission to restore India\u2019s forests has been allowed to wither while the state busies itself counting trees.<\/p>\n
forests<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
India<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
afforestation<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
environmental issues<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
labour<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
climate change<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
government<\/p>\n
\/ <\/p>\n
mining<\/p>\n
Copyright\u00a9 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.<\/p>\n