{"id":37052,"date":"2026-08-16T07:11:09","date_gmt":"2026-08-16T07:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/?p=37052"},"modified":"2026-08-16T07:11:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-16T07:11:09","slug":"it-turns-out-the-original-monsters-inc-plot-was-surprisingly-dark","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/?p=37052","title":{"rendered":"It Turns Out The Original Monsters Inc Plot Was Surprisingly Dark"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We\u2019ve written before at HuffPost UK about how different the pitch for Pretty Woman \u2013 originally called 3000 \u2013 was from the film we know now.<\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t get me started on the extremely unlikely source material for Dirty Dancing 2, either.<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, the first version of Pixar\u2019s Monsters Inc was almost unrecognisable from the film that eventually hit cinemas as well.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, the original script didn\u2019t include lovable protagonist Sulley (at least not in his monster form).<\/p>\n<p>Instead, an early plot focused on a 30-year-old accountant.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking about the film\u2019s origins, Pete Docter, the director of 2001\u2019s Monsters Inc, said on Jeff Goldsmith\u2019s Creative Screenwriting podcast: \u201cWell, my idea was that what it was about was about a 30-year-old man who is like an accountant or something.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe hates his job, and one day he gets a book with some drawings in it that he did when he was a kid from his mum, and he doesn\u2019t think anything of it, and he puts it on the shelf and that night, monsters show up. And nobody else can see them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe thinks he\u2019s starting to go crazy; they follow him to his job and on his dates, and all this \u2013 and it turns out these monsters are fears that he never dealt with as a kid.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A bit like fellow Pixar hit Inside Out, which includes personified emotions, each of these monsters would have represented a different one of the office worker\u2019s fears.<\/p>\n<p>As soon as he was healed from one of the fears these monsters symbolised, it would go away. This was actually a little bittersweet, as the original plot\u2019s main character grew close to some of his new companions.<\/p>\n<p>While I have you, here\u2019s another fact about the first movie: Boo actually had a real name all along. Eagle-eyed fans spotted a detail suggesting she was called Mary, like the child actor Mary Gibbs, who voiced her.<\/p>\n<p>Real-life Mary has since voiced characters in Inside Out, though she was only two years old when she starred in Monsters Inc.<\/p>\n<p><em>Source: <a href='https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.co.uk\/entry\/original-pitch-monsters-inc_uk_6a7f0840e4b0d1c2680df5ab' target='_blank'>Read the original article on www.huffingtonpost.co.uk<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We\u2019ve written before at HuffPost UK about how different the pitch for Pretty Woman \u2013 originally called 3000 \u2013 was from the film we know now. Don\u2019t get me started on the extremely unlikely source material for Dirty Dancing 2, either. As it turns out, the first version of Pixar\u2019s Monsters Inc was almost unrecognisable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":37053,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,3],"tags":[70,28,32],"class_list":["post-37052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commodities","category-technology","tag-impact-gold","tag-signal-buy","tag-stage-stage-1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37052\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/37053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureknowledge.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}