This story is made possible through a partnership between Grist and The Flatwater Free Press, Nebraska\u2019s first independent, nonprofit newsroom focused on investigations and feature stories.\u200b<\/p>\n
In 2017, after about 10 years of discussions, then-superintendent Amy Shane finally got to see a much needed expansion at the O\u2019Neill Public School District\u2019s aging junior-senior high school get approved. Expanded classrooms, state-of-the-art science labs, a new gym. The difference-maker that helped push the $13.2 million project from proposal to reality: taxes on renewable energy developments. Over nine years, the school district has taken in about $7.6 million, which Shane said helped offset the expansion cost.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cWe could get something good for our students without putting a huge burden on our taxpayers,\u201d Shane said.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The project is an example of what economic development and renewable energy proponents have long argued: Renewable energy projects can help communities diversify their revenue streams and offset property tax burdens. The Nebraska excise tax, known as the nameplate capacity tax, requires qualifying renewable energy developments to annually pay $3,518 per megawatt of power that the facility can generate. The money flows to counties whose treasurers allocate it amongst local jurisdictions, including the county governments, community colleges, and school and natural resource districts.\u00a0<\/p>\n
But in recent years, a number of Nebraska counties have enacted strict regulations on renewable developments, as opponents have raised concerns about property values, noise, health, safety, and fire risks.\u00a0<\/p>\n
To support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad-blocker to allow ads on Grist. Here's How<\/p>\n
About 15 years after the tax was implemented, it\u2019s worth looking at where the money has actually gone. Revenue distributed from the tax and the number of counties receiving it has risen over the years. In 2015, just nine counties received nameplate capacity tax revenue, which totaled $2.03 million, including penalties and interest, according to data from the Department of Revenue. In 2025, communities received over $13.6 million. But there\u2019s an imbalance. More than 88 percent of that money went to just 10 of Nebraska\u2019s 93 counties.<\/p>\n
Lawmakers created the nameplate capacity tax in 2010 to replace personal property tax for renewable developments. This allows local taxing authorities to continue to receive a steady amount of tax revenue, said Jon Cannon, executive director of the Nebraska Association of County Officials. The landowner still pays property taxes.\u201cIn county budgets, nameplate capacity tax revenue functions like other general fund revenue,\u201d said Candace Meredith, deputy director of the Nebraska Association of County Officials, in a statement. \u201cIt helps offset the amount that would otherwise need to come from property taxes, allowing counties to keep up with state mandated essential services and inflationary costs.\u201dOn average, counties get about 23 percent of the nameplate tax revenue, Cannon and Meredith said.<\/p>\n
Recently, lawmakers have discussed increasing the rate. A 2025 proposal would have raised it from $3,518 per megawatt to $6,560. But the bill, part of a larger tax package, ultimately died. However, lawmakers did pass a bill this year that expands the tax to include qualifying battery energy storage developments.\u00a0<\/p>\n
According to the state, 1 in 4 jobs in Nebraska are tied to agriculture. The state\u2019s top commodities include cattle and calves, corn, soybeans, and hogs. So it may be no surprise that Nebraskans have raised concerns that renewable energy projects, specifically solar, will reduce farmland. However, there are areas of the state where the land isn\u2019t productive and landowners could benefit from the added revenue. John Hansen, president of the Nebraska Farmers Union, said urban sprawl and acreage housing developments are leading threats to farmland in Nebraska.<\/p>\n
To support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad-blocker to allow ads on Grist. Here's How<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one thing that we know in the ag sector is that we continue to be extremely dependent on off-farm jobs to subsidize our farming operations that are not working, and so every wind turbine is like an off-farm, part-time job, except that the farmer or rancher doesn\u2019t have to leave their farm or ranch to get paid for it,\u201d said Hansen, who chairs the Nebraska Wind and Solar Conference.<\/p>\n
Some Nebraska counties have gone so far as to adopt moratoriums or strict zoning regulations that have effectively banned renewable energy developments or made them more difficult to site.\u00a0<\/p>\n
But with rising power demand, advocates and experts see renewables as a contributor to future economic development in Nebraska. Pushback against renewables comes as utilities in Nebraska and across the country wrestle with an energy crunch caused by skyrocketing demand from electrification, manufacturing, and data centers.<\/p>\n
The Omaha Public Power District, which serves a large swath of eastern Nebraska, is taking an all-of-the-above approach, where coal remains on the grid, natural gas assets are expanding, and the utility plans to have more power purchase agreements with renewable energy developments.\u00a0<\/p>\n