Skip to content
Live newsroom 70 readers online
Tuesday, September 1, 2026 Live Sync: Just now
BreakingEvery Deadline Day transfer and the deals that could still happen
Business

How to tackle the climate impact of datacentres | Letters

Datacentres should generate their own power and control their emissions, writes Richard Lamming, while Michael McClelland says we should reduce our digital communication. Plus a letter from Malcolm Fraser The case of future datacentres demanding more electricity than the entire United Kingdom (Two planned datacentres will have higher UK carbon emissions than ExxonMobil, analysis finds, […]

By deepak · August 31, 2026 · 2 min read

Datacentres should generate their own power and control their emissions, writes Richard Lamming, while Michael McClelland says we should reduce our digital communication. Plus a letter from Malcolm Fraser

The case of future datacentres demanding more electricity than the entire United Kingdom (Two planned datacentres will have higher UK carbon emissions than ExxonMobil, analysis finds, 25 August) is an example of corporates transferring their problems to society and the electorate. This must not be allowed to happen.

One solution would be to make each datacentre responsible for generating all its own electricity and for reducing its CO2 emissions to zero. These installations will have vast areas of roofing and car parks that could be covered in solar panels, space for wind generation and battery storage, and for emissions scrubbers.

If the corporate response is that this is not possible, that is their problem, not ours. Perhaps some innovation is called for.Richard LammingShaldon, Devon

You report on the cost of a proposed new “hyperscale” datacentre in Havering, east London, in terms of its likely carbon footprint (Proposed London datacentre ‘incompatible’ with net zero with 1m-tonne carbon footprint, 21 August) – though the article doesn’t mention the huge use of water, which seems ironic in a period of drought. Locals and others are quite rightly up in arms about this and indeed many other datacentres that have been built or are under development.

Nevertheless, we should all consider our own culpability here. Datacentres exist because we want to send, receive and store digital communications. Understandable enough, but a huge quantity of digital data is either junk or unnecessary. Research suggests that if each person in this country sent one less “thank-you” email a day, there would be an annual saving of more than 16,000 tonnes of CO2. We can all contribute to reducing and managing the problem. A structure of small charges by the government for digital communications would deter us all from generating junk. We pay to post letters, why not for digital communication?Michael McClellandDevizes, Wiltshire

If AI is so clever, it should be required to design itself datacentres that do not command all our water and energy before we let its oligarchs build.Malcolm FraserEdinburgh

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Source: Read the original article on www.theguardian.com

Important Legal & Financial Disclaimer

FutureKnowledge is an automated financial intelligence aggregator. The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and you should not treat any of the website's content as such. We are not registered with the SEC, SEBI, or any regulatory agency. Automated AI-generated content may contain errors. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

© 2026 FutureKnowledge Intelligence. All rights reserved.