Skip to content
Live newsroom 50 readers online
Friday, September 4, 2026 Live Sync: Just now
BreakingChaotic Crystal Palace transfer window leaves Pierre Sage to run the gamut of emotions
Important AVOID INTC Stage 4 (Conv: 1/5 | Size: 10%)

Flock cameras: How a police tool sparked a surveillance revolt in the US

In just seconds, a Flock Safety camera can take six to 12 snapshots of your car as you drive past, capturing the license plate and other details, and storing that information in a database. Flock is one of several companies that sell automatic license plate readers to law enforcement and others, and says it has […]

By deepak · September 4, 2026 · 3 min read

In just seconds, a Flock Safety camera can take six to 12 snapshots of your car as you drive past, capturing the license plate and other details, and storing that information in a database.

Flock is one of several companies that sell automatic license plate readers to law enforcement and others, and says it has more than 120,000 cameras in use across 49 states. Flock says law enforcement can use the data to help investigations – and it touts successes on its website.

But across the country, the collection and storage of that data is raising concerns about mass surveillance, privacy, and potential abuse. Some states and agencies are responding: On Aug. 31, the Florida Department of Transportation cut use permits for the cameras on the state’s highway system, citing “concerning reports of misuse, data privacy concerns, and surveillance schemes.” Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott recently froze state funding for the devices. The mayor of Tempe, Arizona, said on Aug. 26 that his city ended its contract with Flock and turned off cameras in the area.

Technology gives law enforcement new tools, such as automated license plate readers, to help them investigate crimes. But sometimes, that technology can threaten the balance between public safety and privacy, prompting a discussion of how much government agencies should know about people’s lives.

Flock declined to answer questions about its technology. A spokesperson directed a reporter to the company’s website, which details steps it took in August to address public concerns. Those steps include reducing the default for data storage from 30 days to seven, a requirement that law enforcement customers must use a system that detects abnormal use, and a lockout feature that will suspend access “when activity meets criteria for abnormal behavior.”

The issue has now reached Congress. GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who chairs the Judiciary subcommittee on crime and counterterrorism, recently launched an investigation into Flock’s data collection policies. And independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont pledged to soon introduce legislation to halt Flock and other similar companies.

Flock Safety operates on a subscription model, allowing customers such as government agencies and private businesses to rent cameras, which are installed on roads in neighborhoods, cities, and along highways. Law enforcement can use data captured by the cameras to create a timeline of a vehicle’s whereabouts.

Using artificial intelligence, the cameras scan license plate numbers, characters, state names, the vehicle model, even visible damage, and timestamp when a vehicle passes the camera.

Police can choose to share information from the database with other law enforcement agencies.

Flock’s founder, Garrett Langley, says he created the business in 2017 after his neighborhood in Atlanta faced a string of car burglaries. He was frustrated that police often had no leads.

The company says that, in 2025, the cameras helped police in more than 1 million criminal investigations and public safety mishaps, and even helped locate nearly 10,000 missing people.

Privacy advocates say the cameras’ indiscriminate collection of every driver’s vehicle information basically creates a nationwide surveillance network that invites misuse by law enforcement.

Kade Crockford, the director of technology and justice programs at the ACLU of Massachusetts, says Flock’s policy means “police are pushed to share as widely as possible, because if they share with the nationwide network, then they can access data from all of the other police departments that have shared with the nationwide network.”

Torin Monahan, a professor of communication at the University of North Carolina and co-editor in chief of the academic journal Surveillance & Society, says people might be uncomfortable when government authorities gather information that is “deeply revealing of our lives.”

“The more cameras you have, the more information you could glean about a person. But you can detect what neighborhood someone lives in, where they go to work, where they go to school, where they seek healthcare,” Dr. Monahan says.

Source: Read the original article on www.csmonitor.com

Important Legal & Financial Disclaimer

FutureKnowledge is an automated financial intelligence aggregator. The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice and you should not treat any of the website's content as such. We are not registered with the SEC, SEBI, or any regulatory agency. Automated AI-generated content may contain errors. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

© 2026 FutureKnowledge Intelligence. All rights reserved.