As the boundary between style and surveillance blurs, are we prepared to give up privacy in the name of fashion?
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
Since the mass adoption of CCTV, we have accepted — for the most part — giving up a degree of personal privacy in exchange for public safety. But are we prepared to hand that same power to everyday citizens, all in the name of fashion?
In 2025 alone, over 7 million people bought Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses. This rapid adoption has coincided with an alarming rise in covert harassment, prompting public venue bans and calls to ban sales entirely.
Yet these glasses are just the most well-known product in a broader cultural shift experts are calling the "chicification of surveillance."
From smart doorbells to camera-equipped smart cars — as well as rumors of camera-fitted AirPods — the latest tech is quietly turning citizens into passive, continuous monitors of each other.
As the distinction between fashion and surveillance blurs, is this another acceptable trade-off for innovation and convenience, or is it time to rethink our entire approach to public privacy?
For many tech companies, combining AI with audio and video sensors represents a huge opportunity to make seamless products. The major benefits? Better accessibility, usability, and, sometimes, even security.
Take smart glasses, for example. These intelligent wearables offer clear benefits for users, such as live translations, on-the-go content creation, and hands-free commands. These advantages are particularly important for people with disabilities, offering tools that boost everyday independence.
Yet mainstream adoption relies on more than just usefulness. And to position smart hardware as everyday lifestyle items, tech firms are increasingly turning to the fashion world.
Meta, for example, launched a major campaign featuring Kylie Jenner to promote its Ray-Ban smart glasses. Speaking to Glossy, Meta’s Vice President of Fashion, Eva Chen, explained that the new frames are built "to blend into and be a part of your personal style."
This strategy illustrates what digital rights advocates say is a deliberate reframing of surveillance tools.
Lauren Hendry Parsons, Director of Communications at the Mozilla Foundation, notes that tech companies and influencers are shifting how the public views constant recording. How? "Turning what would previously have been private moments or a level of recording that would be quite distasteful or shocking into something cool, fashionable or, in some way, desirable," she told TechRadar.
While acknowledging the genuine value these devices offer for accessibility, Hendry Parsons argues that behind there is a hidden motivation: "This is all about collecting more data, encouraging more people to collect more data."
A post shared by Catharina Doria (@cahdoria)
