The collapse of trade talks and the ensuing fallout have stoked debate about whether the entwined economic relationship between the countries will survive and, if so, in what form
The collapse of trade talks between Canada and the United States this past weekend and the ensuing fallout have stoked debate about whether the entwined economic relationship between the countries — held up around the world as a model of economic cooperation — will survive and, if so, in what form.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Canada-U.S. free trade has evolved over decades through a series of deals, from the 1965 Auto Pact to the current Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, leading to about $1.3 trillion in two-way trade per year, according to the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.
But the abrupt end of talks, followed by a week of finger pointing and name-calling on both sides, is driving home the realization that what once felt like an ironclad partnership that Canadian businesses and consumers could rely on, will never be the same again.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of FP West: Energy Insider will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
“The uncertainty was always there. What changed is that it became visible, and visible risk can be priced,” said Barry Appleton, managing partner of Appleton & Associates International Lawyers LP in Toronto, who believes Canadian businesses will bear the brunt of the change. “Pricing Canada correctly means pricing it lower than it has been.”
The uncertainty was always there. What changed is that it became visible, and visible risk can be priced
Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University and co-chair of the expert group on Canada-U.S. relations, said that while negotiators could hammer out an interim deal to lower some sectoral tariffs punishing Canada’s steel and automotive sectors, it is hard to see the broader trade relationship surviving, especially with CUSMA already subject to 10 years of annual reviews that could significantly change its terms.
“To talk about CUSMA going forward, well, they’re in the process of killing it right now,” Hampson said, pointing to the Trump administration’s full-on assault on Canada’s automotive sector, which was at the heart of the original economic agreement between the two countries.
