By replicating the stickiness of arachnids’ traps, biologists are unlocking a massively efficient way to measure nature.
Counting the creatures in the world around us is critical for a raft of conservation efforts. It helps scientists gauge biodiversity, track migration, and spot invasive species. That census-taking, though, often requires humans to tabulate what they see, trap, or otherwise sense—a potentially laborious, costly process that can still leave gaps.
But developments over the last decade have revolutionized eco-surveillance. Biologists have tapped into sequencing technology to analyze environmental DNA, or eDNA—genetic material shed by living things. Samples collected from scat, soil, water, and air have opened up a new avenue scientists can use to monitor endangered species and detect invasive ones before anyone can even lay eyes on them.
More recently, they’ve uncovered an eDNA gold mine: spiderwebs. The naturally sticky stuff traps material from its arachnid creators, crumbs from their suppers, and, crucially, bio-detritus like saliva and pollen from nearby plants and animals. Every living thing, it seems, sheds copious DNA all over the place, including into the air, and webs then easily ensnare it. “It’s probably one of the best substrates we’ve used and tried to date,” says Joshua Newton, a molecular ecologist at Curtin University in Perth, Australia, who’s sampled flowers, streams, hollows of dead trees, and even filters on moving cars to study vertebrate populations.
Newton recently compared the biological diversity in spiderÂwebs with that found in other sources—including vegetation swabs, water, soil, and a fan outfitted with a filter—near a zoo and wildlife sanctuary outside Perth. Each had its obvious strengths: The vegetation swabs revealed more forest mammals, and the water samples identified more fish. But no passive tool matched spiderwebs’ ability to ID vertebrates, echoing results from a similar study conducted in France.Â
Here’s where things get sticky: To gather meaningful data, they had to destroy about 40 webs. “It kind of goes against everything that we’re trying to do if we’re collecting the home of an organism,” Newton says.Â
Fortunately, his research caught the attention of Angela McGaughran, a genomicist at New Zealand’s University of Waikato. She bought a bag of faux webs from her local Halloween store, wrapped a few coat hangers, and hung them outside. The synthetic material snagged eDNA from nearby cows and sheep, as well as from exotic birds at a nearby aviary. It also detected fungal spores better than real webs—a boon for plant pathologists watching for agricultural threats. Her group is now developing larger experiments to see whether artificial webs can unlock a cheap and ruthlessly efficient way to mimic spiderwebs’ DNA-snagging superpowers anywhere and everywhere.Â
Stephen Ornes is a science writer based in Nashville.
Some donor-conceived people are finding hundreds of siblings. An international cap on donations could help prevent that.
The state’s effort to expand the “right to try” is making headway, and the first drugs are about to be reviewed.
Discussions of the life stage are often clouded by misinformation.
Kidneys kept at subzero temperatures in pressure-controlled containers can be stored for days before transplantation, raising hopes for longer-term storage of donated human organs.
Discover special offers, top stories,
upcoming events, and more.
We’re having trouble saving your preferences.
Try refreshing this page and updating them one
more time. If you continue to get this message,
reach out to us at
customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.
Source: Read the original article on www.technologyreview.com


