Skip to content
Live newsroom 62 readers online
Wednesday, August 26, 2026 Live Sync: 1 minute ago
Demystifying Finance, Technology, and Global Markets for the Next Generation.
BreakingFamilies with one earner told 'use £2,880 rule' to avoid pensions raid
Share Suggestions BUY AMZN Stage 1 (Conv: 2/5 | Size: 10%)

11X cheaper than ChatGPT: Tiny 150M model just proved AI doesn't need to "think out loud" to be smart

Intermediate texts make reasoning AI more expensive When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. Pathway, an AI lab focused on building Post-Transformer architectures, has released new benchmark results for its BDH-CQ reasoning model. According to the researchers, their 150M-parameter model scored 29.5% pass@2 on […]

By deepak · August 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Intermediate texts make reasoning AI more expensive

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Pathway, an AI lab focused on building Post-Transformer architectures, has released new benchmark results for its BDH-CQ reasoning model.

According to the researchers, their 150M-parameter model scored 29.5% pass@2 on the public ARC-AGI-1 evaluation set.

It achieved this at a computed inference cost of $0.0007 per task, roughly eleven times cheaper than ChatGPT's underlying GPT 5.6 Luna (Low) model.

Today, many AI tools waste computing power because of how they are designed, not because deep reasoning demands it.

"Today's AI pays a steep token cost for reasoning, but that cost is imposed by architecture, not by any law of intelligence," said Zuzanna Stamirowska, CEO and co-founder of Pathway.

“We show that a different architecture changes the game and opens up a whole new space in terms of how much intelligence per dollar.”

Amazon Web Services believes that BDH-CQ’s result is a promising step toward using advanced AI reasoning in real products more affordably.

Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!

"Customers are increasingly exploring how to move advanced reasoning from experimentation into production, where performance, efficiency, and scalability all matter," said Nicolas Tarducci of AWS.

ARC-AGI-1, a widely used reasoning benchmark for AI systems, checks whether a system can infer an underlying rule from limited examples and apply it correctly to new inputs.

In this test, OpenAI's Luna model scored only slightly higher at 34.2%, yet running it still costs significantly more ($0.008 per task).

That price gap already includes OpenAI's recent 80% price cut on Luna, which began on July 30th of this year.

Further up the chart, Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro reach 97–98% but cost around $0.5 – $0.6 per task, meaning the frontier's very top costs close to a thousand times more than BDH-CQ for the highest scores.

Source: Read the original article on www.techradar.com